Reflecting on Neil Burgess' Death of Photojournalism editorial (here). One of his major points is
"Magazines and newspapers are no longer putting any money into photojournalism. They will commission a portrait or two. They might send a photographer off with a writer to illustrate the writer’s story, but they no longer fund photojournalism. They no longer fund photo-reportage. They only fund photo illustration."
In my career I have shot for many many magazines. Most of the publications operated like Burgess describes they want(ed) the photographer to illustrate a written story. Most of those publications are already gone. Only one magazine has ever sent me out the door to actually be a photojournalist and it is still in business, still assigning photo essays, still accepting proposals from photographers.
I've always thought that National Geographic was unlike any other magazine in the world. I think that now more than ever.
Stephen Alvarez
Sewanee, TN
